2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Jason
Posts: 10533
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:09 am

2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Jason » Sat Apr 07, 2018 10:26 pm


User avatar
Troy McClure
Posts: 42884
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:37 pm
Location: not Cleveland
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Troy McClure » Sun Apr 08, 2018 12:00 am

Didn't even let the season truly end.
I got a ranch in downtown Dallas/I buy diamonds by the ton/Chase cuties in my Cadillac/Drill oil wells just for fun/But when it comes to boots, I need a deal/That will fit me right, toe to heel/So I get my boots at Western Warehouse.

SaintAngerBH
Posts: 10409
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:55 pm

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby SaintAngerBH » Sun Apr 08, 2018 12:24 am

AV's arrogance over the last couple of days probably didn't help matters.

He sounds delusional.
~Marriage is like putting your hand into a bag of snakes in the hope of pulling out an eel.

Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
ToddM
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ToddM » Sun Apr 08, 2018 10:59 am

I believe this mean no NHL coach was fired during the actual season. That's probably a first.

User avatar
Knives Out
Posts: 17893
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: TO via MTL

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Knives Out » Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:01 pm

There hasn’t been a single in-season NHL head coaching change this year for the first time since 1966-67.
That Hanzal's so hurt right now.

User avatar
ToddM
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ToddM » Sun Apr 08, 2018 11:56 pm

Hockey wasn't even invented until 1999.

User avatar
slaps
Posts: 31356
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Shady Drifter
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby slaps » Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:23 am

You mean defense.

Jason
Posts: 10533
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:09 am

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Jason » Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:18 pm




User avatar
Knives Out
Posts: 17893
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: TO via MTL

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Knives Out » Mon Apr 09, 2018 6:04 pm

Blolz. It's actually 53 losses.

That Hanzal's so hurt right now.

User avatar
ToddM
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ToddM » Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:46 pm

That was Montreal's problem. Not enough kitten-themed motivational posters in the lockeroom.

User avatar
Knives Out
Posts: 17893
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: TO via MTL

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Knives Out » Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:31 pm

RE: Ryan O'Reilly

If he really cared that much about winning then he wouldn't have signed a 7-year contract extension with the Sabres after being traded to them. Instead he went for the money. We're talking about the same guy who drunkenly crashed his truck into a Tim Hortons and then fled the scene. Anyways, he just set the record for most faceoff wins in a single season (1,269) so he would be extremely valuable to a contender, BUT AGAIN, he chose to waste his prime years with the friggin' Sabres.
That Hanzal's so hurt right now.

User avatar
Knives Out
Posts: 17893
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: TO via MTL

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Knives Out » Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:42 pm

ToddM wrote:That was Montreal's problem. Not enough kitten-themed motivational posters in the lockeroom.

Drouin not asked to play for Canada at the World's LOL.
That Hanzal's so hurt right now.

Jason
Posts: 10533
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:09 am

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Jason » Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:54 am



“The reasons I have seen include, misuse of players, inability to adapt, refusal to accept statistical analysis, and, finally, his inability to accept creative young playmakers who invariably make mistakes.”


More on how Vigneault isnt good

User avatar
ScubaSteve
Posts: 36394
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ScubaSteve » Tue Apr 10, 2018 8:28 am

Sounds like a perfect fit for Dallas.
Image Cody Monette likes this.

Eskimo Spy wrote:I would of course make some jokes if any of you died

User avatar
ToddM
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ToddM » Tue Apr 10, 2018 8:33 am

If Nill wants to get fired a year from now, he should totally get AV.

User avatar
wonko80
Posts: 14274
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:03 pm
Location: Frisco

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby wonko80 » Tue Apr 10, 2018 10:31 am

So AV = Hitchcock - 200 lbs

User avatar
ToddM
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ToddM » Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:32 am

Both also relied heavily on world-class goaltending for pretty much all of their success.

User avatar
slaps
Posts: 31356
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Shady Drifter
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby slaps » Tue Apr 10, 2018 12:09 pm

ToddM wrote:Both also relied heavily on world-class goaltending for pretty much all of their success.


Good thing Kari Lehtonen, a #2 overall pick and a franchise goaltender, is available as a free agent.

User avatar
#JTONTFJTGM
Posts: 1787
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:31 am

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby #JTONTFJTGM » Tue Apr 10, 2018 12:34 pm

ToddM wrote:Both also relied heavily on world-class goaltending for pretty much all of their success.

Which of the following goaltenders Hitch had since Ed Belfour would you consider to be world class?

In his first season coaching the Flyers he got to the second round of the 2003 playoffs with Roman Cechmanek.

He coached the Flyers to Game 7 of the 2004 Eastern Conference Final with Robert Esche.

He made the playoffs coaching a terrible Blue Jackets team in 2009 with 20-year-old Steve Mason.

He coached the Blues to Game 6 of the 2016 Western Conference Final with Brian Elliott and had the NHL's second-best record to the Penguins during his six seasons in St. Louis with this group:

Elliott

Jake Allen

Ryan Miller, who was 33 when Doug Armstrong traded for him at the 2014 deadline and put up save percentages of .903 in his 19 regular season starts and .897 in his six playoff starts.

Jaroslav Halak, the best of the bunch who started only two of the Blues' nine playoff games in 2012 because he couldn't stay healthy.

User avatar
ToddM
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ToddM » Tue Apr 10, 2018 12:50 pm

Exactly. Unless Hitch has Belfour in his prime or AV has Luongo/Lundqvist, neither of them can win for *poo poo*.

User avatar
#JTONTFJTGM
Posts: 1787
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:31 am

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby #JTONTFJTGM » Tue Apr 10, 2018 1:03 pm

ToddM wrote:Exactly. Unless Hitch has Belfour in his prime or AV has Luongo/Lundqvist, neither of them can win for *poo poo*.

If winning the Stanley Cup is your requirement for determining coaching success then Vigneault wasn't successful with Luongo and Lundqvist.

Jason
Posts: 10533
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:09 am

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Jason » Tue Apr 10, 2018 1:38 pm

ToddM wrote:Both also relied heavily on world-class goaltending for pretty much all of their success.


With the Rangers he relied on Tortorella's defensive system that was built up for years for the first couple years. Then the more he implemented his own system, the more they were terrible defensively. Gives up tons of great scoring chances. So basically Ruffs system defensively.
Under Tortorella they didn't blow a third period lead for like 129 or 139 games, that changed to regularly blowing leads under AV.
The player usage is terrible, hopefully Nill stays away from him this time. If Hitchcock is moved to advisor role.

User avatar
ToddM
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby ToddM » Tue Apr 10, 2018 2:22 pm

#JTONTFJTGM wrote:
ToddM wrote:Exactly. Unless Hitch has Belfour in his prime or AV has Luongo/Lundqvist, neither of them can win for *poo poo*.

If winning the Stanley Cup is your requirement for determining coaching success then Vigneault wasn't successful with Luongo and Lundqvist.


My base line for "great coach" is someone who can make it past the second round of the playoffs relatively often. Hitch did it twice with Dallas, when he was indeed a "great coach." But he hasn't done much damage in the playoffs in the 17 years since then, so I'd downgrade him to "above average."

AV made it once with Vancouver/PrimeLuongo and once with NY/PrimeLundqvist, if my memory is correct. But the rest of his playoff coaching career has been meh, including a handful of first-round upsets.

I'd lump both in with coaches like Tippett and Trotz, who can win in the regular season but have abysmal playoff records.

"Great" coaches might have a few first-round flameouts here and there, but overall they take care of business in Rounds 1-2 and then either win or lose to another elite team. Coach Q fits that description perfectly. Mike Sullivan, in a really small sample size, looks like he's turned around a Penguins franchise that was burning through coaches every two years and losing to vastly inferior teams in the early rounds. Babcock started out "great" but is slowly drifting into Hitchcock territory: once great, but not much to write home about lately.

That's basically why I'm not really emotionally broken up about missing the playoffs. This current team wasn't going to do any damage --especially in a first-round matchup against Nashville or Winnipeg-- so just re-rack in the offseason and try again. But with a different, non-mediocre coach.

User avatar
Troy McClure
Posts: 42884
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:37 pm
Location: not Cleveland
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby Troy McClure » Tue Apr 10, 2018 2:58 pm

I'd say a great coach can get the most out of their roster. There's no way you can say that about Hitch's work this season.

Now, great coaches have losing seasons. It happens. Bad luck. Injuries. There are always reasons. No coach goes deep in the playoffs every year. But we have Hitch having a bad season his first one on the job. This wasn't even a case of them starting bad and falling short at the end despite looking better the longer Hitch was coaching them. This team collapsed. They got worse as the season went along. The more Hitch coached them, the worse they played.
I got a ranch in downtown Dallas/I buy diamonds by the ton/Chase cuties in my Cadillac/Drill oil wells just for fun/But when it comes to boots, I need a deal/That will fit me right, toe to heel/So I get my boots at Western Warehouse.

SaintAngerBH
Posts: 10409
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:55 pm

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby SaintAngerBH » Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:04 pm

Great coaches win. Bad coaches lose.
~Marriage is like putting your hand into a bag of snakes in the hope of pulling out an eel.

Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
B Kat
Posts: 14359
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:36 pm

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby B Kat » Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:38 pm

A good coach does get the best out of his roster. Like Tippett. :) But a coach is only one component of a good or great team. And it's not just one kind of coach that can be great, it's the right kind that works with the players the team happens to have. And then a lot of other stuff. Health, luck, situation, personalities. It's a crap shoot, even if you have a lot of the components.

We're just mad at their epic collapse and would like to pin the why on something.

User avatar
#JTONTFJTGM
Posts: 1787
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:31 am

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby #JTONTFJTGM » Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:44 pm

ToddM wrote:
#JTONTFJTGM wrote:
ToddM wrote:Exactly. Unless Hitch has Belfour in his prime or AV has Luongo/Lundqvist, neither of them can win for *poo poo*.

If winning the Stanley Cup is your requirement for determining coaching success then Vigneault wasn't successful with Luongo and Lundqvist.

My base line for "great coach" is someone who can make it past the second round of the playoffs relatively often. Hitch did it twice with Dallas, when he was indeed a "great coach." But he hasn't done much damage in the playoffs in the 17 years since then, so I'd downgrade him to "above average."

AV made it once with Vancouver/PrimeLuongo and once with NY/PrimeLundqvist, if my memory is correct. But the rest of his playoff coaching career has been meh, including a handful of first-round upsets.

I'd lump both in with coaches like Tippett and Trotz, who can win in the regular season but have abysmal playoff records.

"Great" coaches might have a few first-round flameouts here and there, but overall they take care of business in Rounds 1-2 and then either win or lose to another elite team. Coach Q fits that description perfectly. Mike Sullivan, in a really small sample size, looks like he's turned around a Penguins franchise that was burning through coaches every two years and losing to vastly inferior teams in the early rounds. Babcock started out "great" but is slowly drifting into Hitchcock territory: once great, but not much to write home about lately.

That's basically why I'm not really emotionally broken up about missing the playoffs. This current team wasn't going to do any damage --especially in a first-round matchup against Nashville or Winnipeg-- so just re-rack in the offseason and try again. But with a different, non-mediocre coach.

Quenneville has coached in a Conference final six times in 19 full seasons. The only non-playoff team of the three he inherited was the 2008-'09 Blackhawks he was hired to coach four games into that season after they'd had an 88-point season in 2007-'08. Patrick Sharp was 26 years old and coming off a 36-goal season, Brent Seabrook was in his fourth season, Duncan Keith was in his third season and Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane were in their second seasons when Quenneville was hired.

Hitch has coached in a Conference Final five times in 17 full seasons and spent two of them and parts of two others coaching the Columbus Blue Jackets who had never appeared in the playoffs before he got there and had topped out with a 74-point season in 2005-'06 and had 12 points in 20 games when he was hired during the 2006-'07 season.

Hitch coached the Stars past the second round of the playoffs in 1998, 1999 and 2000. And the main reason he hasn't been able to do it more often after that is because of the quality of the teams he's coached relative to that of the teams he's lost to in the playoffs, with the exception being the 2015 Minnesota Wild who weren't built better in any significant way.

But following that loss Hitch knocked Quenneville out of the first round of the 2016 playoffs when Quenneville was coaching the better built team, the defending Stanley Cup Champions who weren't missing any of their players.

Can you really be so ignorant about how sports works to believe that Hitch was a great coach from 1997-2000 but wasn't again until 2003-'04 then wasn't again until 2015-'16 and then wasn't again?

The man has been one of the greatest coaches this league has ever seen since his first full season coaching the Stars in 1996-'97 and he's gotten better since then, making every team he's coached better than they were the season before he arrived, which was why Jim Nill hired him and why he'll be inducted into the Hall of Fame when he's done coaching.

SaintAngerBH
Posts: 10409
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:55 pm

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby SaintAngerBH » Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:54 pm

Hitch got better? Winning the cup early in your career and then not making it past the 2nd round more than a couple of times during the rest of your career does not equate to becoming "better since then."
~Marriage is like putting your hand into a bag of snakes in the hope of pulling out an eel.

Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
slaps
Posts: 31356
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Shady Drifter
Contact:

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby slaps » Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:16 pm

Hitchcock may have once been a great coach (and may still be a good one), but the game has passed him by. You don't need to look any further than his player usage this season to see that.

User avatar
mookie1010
Site Admin
Posts: 31337
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: East Side

Re: 2018 NHL Off-Season Thread

Postby mookie1010 » Tue Apr 10, 2018 8:39 pm

slaps wrote:Hitchcock may have once been a great coach (and may still be a good one), but the game has passed him by. You don't need to look any further than his player usage this season to see that.

He might talk about using kids, and earning ice-time, etc, but in the end, he is inherently and genetically risk averse, which I don't think works in the game today.
you don't realize that your pants are too long until you walk to get a taco in the rain.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest